What's the word on NiGHTS?

Wondering everyone's opinion on it, I read some reviews and they are sort of on the fence. Any pros/cons would be nice.What's the word on NiGHTS?
[QUOTE=''blink720'']Wondering everyone's opinion on it, I read some reviews and they are sort of on the fence. Any pros/cons would be nice.[/QUOTE] G4 Tv has the most reliable reviews out there...go by their word, it is always true ( at least that is what i think)that is g4tv.com...... put the game in the search box and get reviews from xplay, (watch the video review)What's the word on NiGHTS?
^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.
[QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE] i played the game and would say the same thing...... oh and never crtiicize Sessler and Web again!!!!!!! would you at least agree that ign is best if xplay did not exist?!
[QUOTE=''ms555''][QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE] i played the game and would say the same thing...... oh and never crtiicize Sessler and Web again!!!!!!! would you at least agree that ign is best if xplay did not exist?![/QUOTE]

Your joking right? Adam sessler and morgan webb are prob two of the least respected/knowledgeable gaming journalist out there. Their show and reviews are a joke.
[QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud'']^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE]What about the controls for the gamecube/c l a s s i c controller?
[QUOTE=''Love_Hina_Lover''][QUOTE=''ms555''][QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE] i played the game and would say the same thing...... oh and never crtiicize Sessler and Web again!!!!!!! would you at least agree that ign is best if xplay did not exist?![/QUOTE]

Your joking right? Adam sessler and morgan webb are prob two of the least respected/knowledgeable gaming journalist out there. Their show and reviews are a joke.[/QUOTE] well then, everything i know is wrong ! lol ......thanks for the notice i did not know that was how people thought of them!
[QUOTE=''ms555''][QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE] i played the game and would say the same thing...... oh and never crtiicize Sessler and Web again!!!!!!! would you at least agree that ign is best if xplay did not exist?![/QUOTE]I agree that IGN is the best. Period. Regardless of how bad X-Play sucks, IGN knows what they're about. It's pretty widely known that Webb %26 Sessler usually don't even play through most games in their entirety %26 don't play through some of them at all before reviewing them. Again, not trying to offend you or anything since you seem to take their reviews so seriously, but as far as I'm concerned, they're the laughingstock of reviewers.
[QUOTE=''Jakendo''][QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE]What about the controls for the gamecube/c l a s s i c controller?[/QUOTE]It works much better with a classic controller.
[QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''][QUOTE=''ms555''][QUOTE=''ColoradoKindBud''] ^No offense, but X-play is a joke. But to stay on topic, did you play the original Nights? This is similar, but isn't as good in the end. It takes about 5-6 hours to beat, but there's a cool secondary mode where you can build your own ''dreamworld'' %26 others can visit it, but you don't actually play it, it's more of a meta-game.The controls aren't as good as the original, %26 for some reason they threw in platforming levels which are seriously out of place %26 don't play well. The graphics are pretty good though. All in all, I would say it's a buy if you're a huge fan of the original mostly because there's still nothing else like it out there, but if you've played the original then you'll definitely notice that this one doesn't quite stack up. It could have been a lot worse though.[/QUOTE] i played the game and would say the same thing...... oh and never crtiicize Sessler and Web again!!!!!!! would you at least agree that ign is best if xplay did not exist?![/QUOTE]I agree that IGN is the best. Period. Regardless of how bad X-Play sucks, IGN knows what they're about. It's pretty widely known that Webb %26 Sessler usually don't even play through most games in their entirety %26 don't play through some of them at all before reviewing them. Again, not trying to offend you or anything since you seem to take their reviews so seriously, but as far as I'm concerned, they're the laughingstock of reviewers.[/QUOTE] thanks alot..... appreciate the fact that you are not harsh and critical, (most people on these forums are apparently!)
This game looks like the stupidest thing ever.
[QUOTE=''Drummersteve'']This game looks like the stupidest thing ever.[/QUOTE] so did mario and sonic when they were first released. and look at them now.