Do you think...

Super Mario Galaxy really deserves to be the second highest rated video game of all time? State whether you think so or not and if not, then say what you think should replace Galaxy.For me, I would replace it with either Super Mario 64 orPaper Mario.Do you think...
Yes it deserves it.Uhm, it may be replaced by Super Mario Bros. 3. Ilove Raccoon Mario, lol.Do you think...
The levels were too small. The game was way too easy. Also the game was too short. No ride able Yoshi? I mean come on they had it in sunshine. All the levels were too strait forward. Also it could use some AA. Better then Mario 64? I think not.I would have gave it a 8.5 or maybe a 9.0, not a 9.5 as gamespot states.
[QUOTE=''zaku101''] The levels were too small.The game was way too easy.Also the game was too short.No ride able Yoshi? I mean come on they had it in sunshine.All the levels were too strait forward.Also it could use some AA.Better then Mario 64? I think not.I would have gave it a 8.5 or maybe a 9.0, not a 9.5 as gamespot states. [/QUOTE]That's the exact reason I made this topic in the first place. I was really surprised after finishing this game that it was the 2nd highest rated game of all time. It was too easy(except in some situations), the game was too linear, and there isn't much replay value.
[QUOTE=''bowserjr123''][QUOTE=''zaku101''] The levels were too small.The game was way too easy.Also the game was too short.No ride able Yoshi? I mean come on they had it in sunshine.All the levels were too strait forward.Also it could use some AA.Better then Mario 64? I think not.I would have gave it a 8.5 or maybe a 9.0, not a 9.5 as gamespot states. [/QUOTE]That's the exact reason I made this topic in the first place. I was really surprised after finishing this game that it was the 2nd highest rated game of all time. It was too easy(except in some situations), the game was too linear, and there isn't much replay value.[/QUOTE]If you ask me it disappointed me just like paper Mario 2 did.